Re: Comment on GatherPath.single_copy

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comment on GatherPath.single_copy
Date: 2016-09-01 07:15:16
Message-ID: 20160901.161516.45324746.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:26:22 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in <5934(dot)1472642782(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Robert, could you fix the documentation for that field so it's
> >> intelligible?
>
> > Uh, maybe. The trick, as you've already noted, is finding something
> > better. Maybe this:
>
> > - bool single_copy; /* path must not be executed >1x */
> > + bool single_copy; /* don't execute path in multiple processes */
>
> OK by me.
>
> regards, tom lane

Me too, thanks.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-01 07:19:39 Re: pg_basebackup stream xlog to tar
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-09-01 07:12:31 Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution