| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix pg_receivexlog --synchronous |
| Date: | 2016-08-29 15:39:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20160829153917.ahhuu4f5ubzsaicp@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-08-29 07:34:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Fix pg_receivexlog --synchronous
>
> The buildfarm says you broke the 9.5 branch.
>
> In general, pushing inessential patches just a few hours before a wrap
> deadline is a dangerous business. Pushing them without any testing
> is close to irresponsible.
And the comment change doesn't actually seem an improvement, because it
makes it harder to understand why a slot forces this to be enabled.
Do we want to revert this until the release, or does somebody want to
push the fix?
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-08-29 15:49:23 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix pg_receivexlog --synchronous |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-08-29 14:36:39 | pgsql: Translation updates |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-08-29 15:41:03 | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-08-29 15:35:45 | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |