| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
| Date: | 2016-08-26 21:34:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20160826213406.jzmbsbepbzvonxl2@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-08-26 17:31:14 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I agree with all that. But the subject line is specifically about
> moving pg_xlog. So if your opinion is that we shouldn't move pg_xlog,
> then that is noted. But if we were to move it, we can think about a
> good place to move it to.
I think it's probably worth moving pg_xlog, because the benefit also
includes preventing a few users from shooting themselves somewhere
vital. That's imo much less the case for some of the other moves. But I
still don't think think a largescale reorganization is a good idea,
it'll just stall and nothing will happen.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-08-26 21:42:01 | Re: Renaming some binaries |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-08-26 21:31:14 | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |