Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date: 2016-08-25 02:54:41
Message-ID: 20160825025441.sjieycl3c5baoaqm@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-08-24 22:33:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Possibly it would make sense for this to be configurable at initdb
> > time instead of requiring a recompile;
>
> ... but I think this is just folly. You'd have to do major amounts
> of work to keep, eg, slave servers on the same page as the master
> about what the segment size is.

Don't think it'd actually be all that complicated, we already verify
the compatibility of some things. But I'm doubtful it's worth it, and
I'm also rather doubtful that it's actually without overhead.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-08-25 03:02:41 Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-08-25 02:40:26 Re: increasing the default WAL segment size