Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Date: 2016-08-19 00:28:58
Message-ID: 20160819002858.r2truhyki3qnmu5w@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-08-18 17:27:59 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Rebased version attached. A review would be welcome. Plan to push this
> > forward otherwise in the not too far away future.
>
> I can review this next week.

Thanks

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-08-19 00:35:34 Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-08-19 00:27:59 Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive