Re: To Tom Lane 2016-08-15 <20160815111057(dot)v2mqqjp4aabvwqnc(at)msg(dot)df7cb(dot)de>
> Re: Tom Lane 2016-07-30 <1184(dot)1469890030(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > In short, I think that the way to make something like this work is to
> > figure out how to have "virtual" catalog rows describing a temp table.
> > Or maybe to partition the catalogs so that vacuuming away temp-table
> > rows is easier/cheaper than today.
>
> We should also be thinking about how the opposite idea of "global"
> temp tables
(Obviously I should catch up on the rest of the thread when postponing
a message for an hour or two. Sorry for the duplicated idea here...)
Christoph