Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off
Date: 2016-08-04 07:52:46
Message-ID: 20160804075246.dww5veahf7m54y5z@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-08-04 16:48:11 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Here is a different proposal: documenting instead that disabling that
> parameter on Windows can improve performance, at the cost of losing
> information verbosity for processes.

The benefit on windows seems pretty marginal, given the way it has to be
viewed. People installing processexplorer et. al. to view a handle that
have to know about, will be able to change the config.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2016-08-04 07:56:41 Re: Leaking memory in text_overlay function
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-08-04 07:48:11 Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off