Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(k == indices_count)", File: "tsvector_op.c", Line: 511)

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(k == indices_count)", File: "tsvector_op.c", Line: 511)
Date: 2016-08-04 04:14:20
Message-ID: 20160804041420.GA2402899@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:52:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I'm thinking there are two distinct bugs here.
>
> Actually, make that three bugs. I was so focused on the crashing
> that I failed to notice that ts_delete wasn't producing sane answers
> even when it didn't crash:

[Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]

The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Teodor,
since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
in advance of shipping 9.6rc1 next week. Consequently, I will appreciate your
efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.

[1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-08-04 04:25:55 Re: New version numbering practices
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-08-04 03:22:03 Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling