Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Anton Dignös <dignoes(at)inf(dot)unibz(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Johann Gamper <gamper(at)inf(dot)unibz(dot)it>, Michael Böhlen <boehlen(at)ifi(dot)uzh(dot)ch>, Moser Peter <peter(dot)moser(at)unibz(dot)it>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date: 2016-07-22 22:01:37
Message-ID: 20160722220137.GA1411@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:15:17PM +0200, Anton Dignös wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> we are a group of researches that work on temporal databases. Our
> main focus is the processing of data with time intervals, such as
> the range types in PostgreSQL.

Thanks for your hard work so far!

[Explanation and examples elided]

To what extent, if any, are you attempting to follow the SQL:2011
standard?

http://cs.ulb.ac.be/public/_media/teaching/infoh415/tempfeaturessql2011.pdf

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2016-07-22 22:02:32 AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-07-22 20:53:00 Re: Rethinking TupleTableSlot deforming