From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Anton Dignös <dignoes(at)inf(dot)unibz(dot)it> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Johann Gamper <gamper(at)inf(dot)unibz(dot)it>, Michael Böhlen <boehlen(at)ifi(dot)uzh(dot)ch>, Moser Peter <peter(dot)moser(at)unibz(dot)it> |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types |
Date: | 2016-07-22 22:01:37 |
Message-ID: | 20160722220137.GA1411@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:15:17PM +0200, Anton Dignös wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> we are a group of researches that work on temporal databases. Our
> main focus is the processing of data with time intervals, such as
> the range types in PostgreSQL.
Thanks for your hard work so far!
[Explanation and examples elided]
To what extent, if any, are you attempting to follow the SQL:2011
standard?
http://cs.ulb.ac.be/public/_media/teaching/infoh415/tempfeaturessql2011.pdf
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2016-07-22 22:02:32 | AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-07-22 20:53:00 | Re: Rethinking TupleTableSlot deforming |