Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6
Date: 2016-07-15 06:35:46
Message-ID: 20160715063546.GF1905806@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 12:55:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Noah Misch (noah(at)leadboat(dot)com) wrote:
> > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
>
> Unfortunately, not going to make any further progress on this tonight or
> over the weekend as I'm going to be out of town. I believe I've
> convinced myself that adding a template1 entry to pg_init_privs will be
> both sufficient and produce the correct results, along with adjusting
> the query in pg_dumpall to join through it. Will provide an update on
> Monday.

This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is long past due for your status update. Kindly
send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
status update. (Your Tuesday posting lacked a date.)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2016-07-15 06:38:54 Re: Document that vacuum can't truncate if old_snapshot_threshold >= 0
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-07-15 05:27:18 Re: Oddity in handling of cached plans for FDW queries