Re: Showing parallel status in \df+

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date: 2016-07-12 02:36:51
Message-ID: 20160712023651.GA854050@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:

> > It would certainly be easy enough to do that, as long as you don't mind
> > hard-wiring into psql the knowledge that "internal" and "C" are the
> > languages to show prosrc for. "Source code" would no longer be a very
> > appropriate column name, though it already was not for these cases.
> > I'd be inclined to call it "Internal name" instead.
>
> That would certainly work for me.

So prosrc for internal/C and NULL for others? WFM.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-07-12 02:42:55 Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-07-12 02:04:17 Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution