Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails
Date: 2016-07-08 18:42:20
Message-ID: 20160708184220.GA733807@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:

> At Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:39:59 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqTv5gmKQcNDoFGTGqoqXz2xLz4RRw247oqOJzZTVy6-7Q(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> > <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:

> > Indeed, and you could just do the following to reproduce the failure
> > with the recovery test suite, so I would suggest adding this test in
> > the patch:
> > --- a/src/test/recovery/t/001_stream_rep.pl
> > +++ b/src/test/recovery/t/001_stream_rep.pl
> > @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ $node_standby_1->start;
> > # pg_basebackup works on a standby).
> > $node_standby_1->backup($backup_name);
> >
> > +# Take a second backup of the standby while the master is offline.
> > +$node_master->stop;
> > +$node_standby_1->backup('my_backup_2');
> > +$node_master->start;
>
> I'm not sure that adding the test case for a particular bug like
> this is appropriate. But it would be acceptable because it
> doesn't take long time and it is separate from standard checks.

The reason this test is appropiate is that it's testing a feature we
want to support, namely that taking a backup from a standby works even
when the master is stopped. It's not a test for this particular bug,
even though the feature doesn't work because of this bug.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-07-08 18:44:44 Re: MVCC overheads
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-07-08 18:39:26 Re: Showing parallel status in \df+