Re: Stored procedure version control

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Stored procedure version control
Date: 2016-07-02 12:19:34
Message-ID: 20160702121934.GA21879@hermes.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:16:49AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> It's not really necessary to create version down scripts. In five
> years of managing complex database environments we've never had to
> roll a version back and likely never will; in the event of a disaster
> it's probably better to restore from backup anyways.

Also, a very robust approach to rollback is to clone the
existing databse before upgrading the schema (if feasible due
to size). This is the approach GNUmed uses - migration
scripts are up only, as many of them as possible are
idempotent, and we clone the existing database into a new one
before the upgrade is run. That way, users can go back to the
previous database immediately anytime and reattempt the
upgrade when convenient.

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2016-07-02 13:27:54 Re: --EXTERNAL--Re: PSQL does not remove obvious useless joins
Previous Message Rob Sargent 2016-07-02 00:22:50 Re: Stored procedure version control