| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive |
| Date: | 2016-07-01 01:23:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20160701012315.7ng4zsnsxcoecuw6@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-06-30 18:14:15 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Took a while. But here we go. The attached version is a significantly
> > revised version of my earlier patch. Notably I've pretty much entirely
> > revised the code in _mdfd_getseg() to be more similar to the state in
> > master. Also some comment policing.
>
> Are you planning to pick this up again, Andres?
I plan to, once the tree opens again. Likely needs some considerable
updates for recent changes.
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-07-01 01:25:54 | Bad behavior from plpython 'return []' |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-07-01 01:14:15 | Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive |