From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6 |
Date: | 2016-06-29 13:16:28 |
Message-ID: | 20160629131628.GO21416@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Do this:
> >
> > CREATE DATABASE test1;
> > REVOKE CONNECT ON DATABASE test1 FROM PUBLIC;
> >
> > Run pg_dumpall.
> >
> > In 9.5, this produces
> >
> > CREATE DATABASE test1 WITH TEMPLATE = template0 OWNER = peter;
> > REVOKE ALL ON DATABASE test1 FROM PUBLIC;
> > REVOKE ALL ON DATABASE test1 FROM peter;
> > GRANT ALL ON DATABASE test1 TO peter;
> > GRANT TEMPORARY ON DATABASE test1 TO PUBLIC;
> >
> > In 9.6, this produces only
> >
> > CREATE DATABASE test1 WITH TEMPLATE = template0 OWNER = peter;
> > GRANT TEMPORARY ON DATABASE test1 TO PUBLIC;
> > GRANT ALL ON DATABASE test1 TO peter;
> >
> > Note that the REVOKE statements are missing. This does not correctly
> > recreate the original state.
>
> If I were a betting man, I'd bet that one of Stephen Frost's pg_dump
> commits broke this. But we'd have to bisect to be sure.
Wouldn't be too surprising. I'm planning to look into this a bit later
today.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-06-29 13:34:31 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-29 13:15:46 | Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6 |