| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Prepared statements and generic plans |
| Date: | 2016-06-04 02:20:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20160604022035.GA11505@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 08:27:38AM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> This goes back to Bruce's motivation but as long as it goes into the internals
> section I have no problem adding material that someone felt was worth their
OK, updated version attached. I added "potential" to the first
paragraph, and added "estimated cost" to the later part, fixed the
"cheaper than", and clarified that we add the plan time cost to the
non-generic plan, which is how it can be cheaper than the generic plan.
I also moved the "Once a generic plan is chosen" line.
Yeah, that's a lot of changes, but they all improved the text. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| prepare.diff | text/x-diff | 4.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2016-06-04 02:25:52 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
| Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2016-06-04 02:10:44 | HashAggregate row estimate = 200 |