Re: LSN as a recovery target

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LSN as a recovery target
Date: 2016-05-24 16:14:09
Message-ID: 20160524161408.GA6640@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Michael Paquier 2016-05-24 <CAB7nPqQRXsC8=ozh6GpjLnpZ=MeooUZOaAbzx28n2bjSMv2B4g(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> Yeah, that's really something that covers only a narrow case, though
> if we don't have it when we need it we're limited to some hacks.
> Perhaps people who have the advanced level to use such a thing have
> the level to use hacks anyway..

I'd think recovery_target_lsn would be more useful in practice than
the existing recovery_target_xid. So I don't see why it shouldn't just
be added, also given it's likely very unobtrusive to do so.

Christoph

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-24 16:17:21 Re: pg_upgrade error regarding hstore operator
Previous Message parihaaraka 2016-05-24 15:45:43 Re: pg_upgrade error regarding hstore operator