From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | mixtrue(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Parallel query |
Date: | 2016-05-22 13:04:56 |
Message-ID: | 20160522.220456.102295056025237357.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
What's MPI?
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
> Maybe we can refere to the MPI test cases.
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Hao Lee <mixtrue(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> What kind of cases do you want to run? beside the multi-cores, i think the
>> working mem and its access rate are also a main criteria. As you known the
>> parallel query uses DSM as IPC tools, which means it will meet the memory
>> access barrier.,the memory bus has its access rate limitation. the
>> different system architecture, such as different CPU architect, etc,will
>> also be considered when we do the performace test. Do we need to consider
>> what i mentioned above?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Hao LEE.
>>
>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Robert,
>>> (and others who are involved in parallel query of PostgreSQL)
>>>
>>> PostgreSQL Enterprise Consortium (one of the PostgreSQL communities in
>>> Japan, in short "PGECons") is planning to test the parallel query
>>> performance of PostgreSQL 9.6. Besides TPC-H (I know you have already
>>> tested on an IBM box), what kind of tests would you like be performed?
>>>
>>> We are planning to use a big intel box (like more than 60 cores).
>>> Any suggestions are welcome.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> --
>>> Tatsuo Ishii
>>> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>>> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
>>> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>>>
>>
>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Seltenreich | 2016-05-22 16:02:14 | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in parallel worker (ExecInitSubPlan) |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2016-05-22 12:24:04 | Re: Autovacuum to prevent wraparound tries to consume xid |