| From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-13 22:44:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20160513224446.GB29945@nighthawk.caipicrew.dd-dns.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:31:00PM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> The underlying premise, for me, of choosing .4 or .5 was that presently we
> discontinue support after 5 years/releases. A new .0 would come out just
> as we discontinue the previous .0
Well maybe the 5 year support cycle would be nice to encode, but how is
.0 different from .1 then? You make sound like .0 would be similar to
Ubuntu's LTS which is not the case, unless you want to propose that only
.0 releases get 5 years and not the in-betweens? That'd be a shame.
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2016-05-13 23:32:57 | Re: 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-05-13 22:40:52 | Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - getting server crash in left outer join of three table |