Re: 10.0

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-05-13 21:39:23
Message-ID: 20160513213923.GD10319@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:36:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I mean we haven't yet actually identified a problem we are trying to
> > solve have we?
>
> The problem I'd like to solve is not having to have this type of
> discussion again in future years ...

If pg_logical and/or more parallelism are in 9.7, there will be no need
for a discussion, just like 8.0 and 9.0 decisions.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 21:36:50 from Tom Lane

Responses

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 21:55:22 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-05-13 21:50:09 Re: 10.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-05-13 21:36:50 Re: 10.0