| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: what to revert |
| Date: | 2016-05-10 16:21:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20160510162100.GA543612@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Yes, I'd like to repeat the tests with other workloads - I'm thinking about
> regular pgbench and perhaps something that'd qualify as 'mostly read-only'
> (not having a clear idea how that should work).
You can use "-bselect-only(at)9 -bsimple-update(at)1" for a workload that's
10% the write transactions and 90% the read-only transactions. If you
have custom .sql scripts you can use the @ with -f too.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-05-10 16:24:30 | Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast() busted? (was atomic pin/unpin causing errors) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-05-10 16:20:02 | Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast() busted? (was atomic pin/unpin causing errors) |