Re: Re: "pg_xxx" role name restriction not applied to bootstrap superuser?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, glyn(at)8kb(dot)co(dot)uk
Subject: Re: Re: "pg_xxx" role name restriction not applied to bootstrap superuser?
Date: 2016-05-08 16:29:56
Message-ID: 20160508162956.GZ10850@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> >> If we're going to enforce such a restriction, I think it would be
> >> a good thing for it to be in place in beta1.
>
> > Makes sense.
> > Patch attached. I'll push this in a bit, barring objections.
>
> Three minor wording quibbles:
>
> * s/reserved/disallowed/ maybe? Not 100% sold on this.
>
> * s/can not/cannot/
>
> * use double quotes not single around pg_

Blargh. Missed this before pushing, sorry.

Will fix.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-05-08 16:59:05 Re: Re: "pg_xxx" role name restriction not applied to bootstrap superuser?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-05-08 16:29:27 Re: new tests post-feature freeze (was pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump)