Re: Bogus cleanup code in PostgresNode.pm

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus cleanup code in PostgresNode.pm
Date: 2016-04-27 19:20:49
Message-ID: 20160427192049.GA43498@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Now, whether using END is really an improvement is a separate question.
> > I have the impression that END calls happen in a better-defined order,
> > but I'm not a perl monk.
>
> For the archive's sake, 08af9219 is the result commit.

Thanks!

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-04-27 19:27:21 Re: pg_dump dump catalog ACLs
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-04-27 19:16:23 Re: pg_dump dump catalog ACLs