| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |
| Date: | 2016-04-27 03:07:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20160427030705.GB3739@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:01:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:46:43PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I think there's a fine line between advocating good third-party
> > projects and undue partisanship. If we advocate a bunch of
> > Crunchy-developed tools and no 2ndQuadrant-developed tools, or visca
> > versa, then people at the other company may not like that very much.
> > Never mind what might be done by EnterpriseDB, Dalibo, PG Experts, and
> > others. If we never recommend anything, that's not good, but favoring
> > one company over another is not good either. I don't know how to
> > strike the right balance there, but I think that's a topic for another
> > day.
>
> I agree we need more of a tool focus, e.g. I still can't figure out the
> features of the various backup tools. I think it needs a wiki page or a
> set of blog entries to really cover the details.
FYI, if we can agree on a summary I think we could add it to the
official docs.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh berkus | 2016-04-27 03:42:54 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-04-27 03:01:16 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |