| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions |
| Date: | 2016-04-25 15:56:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20160425155627.e4yk72bm2naisesz@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-04-25 08:55:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Andres, this issue has now been open for more than a month, which is
> frankly kind of ridiculous given the schedule we're trying to hit for
> beta. Do you think it's possible to commit something RSN without
> compromising the quality of PostgreSQL 9.6?
Frankly I'm getting a bit annoyed here too. I posted a patch Friday,
directly after getting back from pgconf.us. Saturday I posted a patch
for an issue which I didn't cause, but which caused issues when testing
the patch in this thread. Sunday I just worked on some small patch - one
you did want to see resolved too. It's now 8.30 Monday morning. What's
the point of your message?
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-04-25 16:14:11 | Re: BUG #14111: After minor upgrade (9.2.6 -> 9.2.16): ERROR: failed to build any 2-way joins |
| Previous Message | John Lumby | 2016-04-25 15:45:48 | Re: BUG #14109: pg_rewind fails to update target control file in one scenario |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-25 16:04:22 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-04-25 15:27:24 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |