Re: PGCTLTIMEOUT in pg_regress, or skink versus the clock

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGCTLTIMEOUT in pg_regress, or skink versus the clock
Date: 2016-04-21 02:12:31
Message-ID: 20160421021231.GA2020479@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 06:38:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I am thinking that we missed a bet in commit 2ffa86962077c588
> et al, and that pg_regress's hard-wired 60-second start timeout ought to
> be overridable from an environment variable just as pg_ctl's timeout is.
> It might as well be the same environment variable, so I propose the
> attached patch.

> Any objections?

Looks reasonable.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-04-21 02:19:57 Re: Typos/Questions in bloom documentation
Previous Message Amit Langote 2016-04-21 02:05:38 Re: Declarative partitioning