Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique
Date: 2016-04-07 19:02:14
Message-ID: 20160407190214.GA569221@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Anyway, while refactoring the make_join_rel/add_paths_to_joinrel division
> of labor wouldn't be such a big deal in itself, I don't want to commit a
> change to JoinType only to undo it later; that would be too much churn.
> So I think we need to resolve this question before we can move forward.
> I don't know if you have time to look at this now --- my clock says it's
> already Friday morning in New Zealand.

FWIW the feature freeze rules state that it is allowed for a committer
to request an extension to the feature freeze date for individual
patches:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoY56w5FOzeEo%2Bi48qehL%2BBsVTwy-Q1M0xjUhUCwgGW7-Q%40mail.gmail.com
It seems to me that the restrictions laid out there are well met for
this patch, if you only need a couple of additional days for this patch
to get in.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Ullrich 2016-04-07 19:10:33 Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-07 18:49:38 Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique