Re: [CommitFest App] Feature request -- review e-mail additions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: José Luis Tallón <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CommitFest App] Feature request -- review e-mail additions
Date: 2016-04-07 16:37:55
Message-ID: 20160407163755.GA504109@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > José Luis Tallón wrote:
> >
> > > Just wanted to suggest two minor mods to the review e-mails
> > > auto-generated by the app:
> > >
> > > * Prepend a [review] tag to the e-mail subject
> > > ... so that e-mails sent to -hackers will read " [HACKERS] [review]
> > > <patch title goes here>"
> >
> > Changing the subject of an email causes Gmail to break the threads, so
> > anything in that line should be discouraged. -1 from me. I would be
> > happier if the subject of the submission email is kept intact, i.e. not
> > use the patch title that was used in commitfest app but use the one in
> > the email. These often differ.
>
> That's what the code tries to do. It will add a Re: if there isn't one
> already, but otherwise should reuse it. At least that's how it's trying to
> work - do you have a pointer to an example where it doesn't, so I can
> investigate if something is off?

No, I don't, I was just stating that José Luis' description seemed wrong
to me. I haven't looked carefully at the emails generated from
commitfest app, but it seems to work fine already.

> > > * Auto-CC the patch author on this e-mail
> > > I guess this should speed up reactions / make communication a bit
> > > more fluid.
> >
> > Yes, strong +1 on this.
>
> Ok, that should be easy enough to add. I've stuck it on my TODO list and
> will try to get it ASAP.

Thanks for doing this :-)

> > 3) Have the auto-generated emails insert In-Reply-To headers (and
> > perhaps References).
>
> It already does. Both. Again, do you have a pointer to where it doesn't?

No, works fine AFAICS.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoff Winkless 2016-04-07 16:41:28 Re: Why the "UPDATE tab SET tab.col" is invalid?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-04-07 16:37:39 Re: pg_ctl promote wait