Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2016-04-04 08:59:20
Message-ID: 20160404085920.GA7426@toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2016-04-04 17:28:07 +0900, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> Barring any objections, I'll commit this patch.

No objections, just a minor wording tweak:

doc/src/sgml/config.sgml:

"The synchronous standbys will be the standbys that their names appear
early in this list" should be "The synchronous standbys will be those
whose names appear earlier in this list".

doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml:

"The standbys that their names appear early in this list are given
higher priority and will be considered as synchronous" should be "The
standbys whose names appear earlier in the list are given higher
priority and will be considered as synchronous".

"The standbys that their names appear early in the list will be used as
the synchronous standby" should be "The standbys whose names appear
earlier in the list will be used as synchronous standbys".

You may prefer to reword this in some other way, but the current "that
their names appear" wording should be changed.

-- Abhijit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-04-04 09:03:41 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-04-04 08:58:31 Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics