Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
Date: 2016-04-01 12:31:36
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2016-03-29 10:15:51 -0400, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net wrote:
> Either way it looks like you need to post a patch with more
> documentation - do you know when you'll have that ready?

Here it is.

(I was actually looking for other potential callers, but I couldn't find
any. There are some places that take a RangeVar and make a list from it,
but they are creating new nodes, and don't quite fit. So the only change
in this patch is to add a comment above the get_object_address_rv

Álvaro, do you like this one any better?

-- Abhijit

Attachment Content-Type Size
extdepend-20160401.diff text/x-diff 15.3 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-04-01 12:52:24 SSL indicator in psql prompt
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-04-01 10:46:29 Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6