Re: Timeline following for logical slots

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timeline following for logical slots
Date: 2016-04-01 06:52:17
Message-ID: 20160401065217.GB9074@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2016-04-01 08:46:01 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> That's a fundamental misunderstanding on your part (perhaps created by
> imprecise docs).

> > Speaking of which, did you see the proposed README I sent for
> > src/backend/replication/logical ?
>
> I skimmed it. But given we have a CF full of patches, some submitted
> over a year ago, it seems unfair to spend time on a patch submitted a
> few days ago.

For that purpos

WRT design readme, it might be interesting to look at 0009 in
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20140127162006.GA25670%40awork2.anarazel.de

That's not up2date obviously, but it still might help.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2016-04-01 07:03:31 Re: Incorrect format in error message
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-04-01 06:46:01 Re: Timeline following for logical slots