Re: PostgreSQL advocacy

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL advocacy
Date: 2016-03-22 16:58:37
Message-ID: 20160322165837.GF11970@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:16:22AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian schrieb am 22.03.2016 um 16:07:
> >>
> >> However, I do think database upgrades are easier with Oracle RAC
> >
> > I think you can do a rolling upgrade with a standby, but I'm not entirely sure.
>
> I find Slony good for upgrading versions with minimal downtime,
> including major version changes. It's very nature allows you to
> migrate pieces and parts for testing etc, in ways that any kind of
> byte streaming just can't do.

Yes, and I assume logical replication will allow similar easy upgrades.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frits Jalvingh 2016-03-22 17:14:40 Equivalent of Oracle's per-session statistics (v$client_stats)?
Previous Message Alexey.I.Larin@gmail.com 2016-03-22 16:25:37 Re: pglogical two way replication problem