Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
Date: 2016-03-22 00:11:46
Message-ID: 20160322001146.GA21255@toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2016-03-21 15:43:09 -0400, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> I also think we should allow a function to depend on multiple
> extensions, as Alvaro mentions downthread.

I'm working on an updated patch, will post shortly.

-- Abhijit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-22 00:26:25 Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-22 00:03:41 Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)