Re: multivariate statistics v14

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: multivariate statistics v14
Date: 2016-03-22 10:41:01
Message-ID: 20160322.194101.1823396309134293700.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> Hum. So without 0006 or beyond, there's not much benefit for the
>> PostgreSQL users, and you are not too confident about 0006 or
>> beyond. Then I would think it is a little bit hard to justify in
>> putting 000[2-5] into 9.6. I really like this feature and would like
>> to see in PostgreSQL someday, but I'm not sure if we should put the
>> patches (0002-0005) into PostgreSQL now. Please let me know if there's
>> some reaons we should put the patches into PostgreSQL now.
>
> I don't think so. While being able to combine multiple statistics is
> certainly useful, I'm convinced that the initial patched add enough

Can you please elaborate a little bit more how combining multiple
statistics is useful?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-03-22 10:52:21 Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
Previous Message Alexey Grishchenko 2016-03-22 10:15:16 Re: Endless loop calling PL/Python set returning functions