Re: WIP: Access method extendability

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Access method extendability
Date: 2016-03-17 18:04:05
Message-ID: 20160317180405.GA56203@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>
> >>I don't see any objection, is consensus reached? I'm close to comiit
> >>that...
> >>
> >
> >I did only cursory review on the bloom contrib module and don't really have
> >complaints there, but I know you can review that one. I'd like the English of
> >the generic_xlog.c description improved but I won't get to it before weekend.
>
> So, per patch status:
> create-am
> ready

Please wait a bit on this one -- I think more review is warranted.
I will try to review it early next week.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2016-03-17 18:16:35 Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2016-03-17 17:57:27 Re: Proposal: BSD Authentication support