Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Date: 2016-03-11 08:36:45
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:30:13PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> ... eventually.
> Sometimes the bug reports start. Occasionally you get a "thanks, this looks
> interesting/handy". But usually just bug reports or complaints that whatever
> you built isn't good enough to meet some random person's particular use case.
> Ah well. 

As they say, if this was easy, everyone would be doing it. ;-)

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-03-11 08:40:06 Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-03-11 08:32:59 Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?