Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18
Date: 2016-03-10 22:41:19
Message-ID: 20160310224119.wb4k4q5wuxsooagh@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-03-10 23:38:38 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> I'm not sure I've seen these performance... If you have hard evidence,
> please feel free to share it.

Man, are you intentionally trying to be hard to work with? To quote the
email you responded to:

> My current plan is to commit this with the current behaviour (as in this
> week[end]), and then do some actual benchmarking on this specific
> part. It's imo a relatively minor detail.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2016-03-10 22:43:46 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-10 22:40:12 Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean