Re: WIP: Access method extendability

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Access method extendability
Date: 2016-03-09 12:27:10
Message-ID: 20160309122710.GA958727@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi. As I just said to Tomas Vondra: since your patch creates a new
object type, please make sure to add a case to cover it in the
object_address.sql test. That verifies some things such as
pg_identify_object and related.

Thanks,

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2016-03-09 12:29:57 Re: Optimizer questions
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-03-09 12:26:01 Re: the include-timestamp data returned by pg_logical_slot_peek_changes() is always 2000-01-01 in 9.5.1