Re: Optimizer questions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Optimizer questions
Date: 2016-03-08 14:58:58
Message-ID: 20160308145858.GA891717@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> > Attached please find improved version of the optimizer patch for LIMIT clause.

> For now, I've set this commitfest entry to Waiting on Author. There's
> still time to consider a rewrite in this 'fest, if you can get it done
> in a week or two.

Yes. Given that Konstantin will have to struggle to get this patch
rebased on top of upper-planner pathification which appeared out of the
blue at the last minute, it seems fair to give some additional time
for the required work.

However, we still have a commitfest schedule to adhere to, and
Konstantin has two other patches in the commitfest:
* Support ALTER INDEX ... WHERE ... clause
* eXtensible Transaction Manager API (v2)

and since we also need his contribution as a patch reviewer, it seems
unfair to just let all his patches move forward --- if we did that, he
would have no time at all to review other's patches, which is a
requirement.

Since we're only one week into the commitfest, I think it's his
prerogative to decide what to do. I think there are two options: he can
either continue with this patch only, and get back from WoA to
Needs-Review in (hopefully) one week; or he can drop this one from the
commitfest right now and concentrate on the two other ones. Either way,
as I already stated, we need his contribution as a reviewer for other
patche, too.

(If I were in his socks, I wouldn't have any hope that the XTM patch
would go in for 9.6 at this point; the most I'd hope is to have lots of
feedback in order to have something to propose for early 9.7. I don't
know the status of the ALTER INDEX one, so I can't comment there.)

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-03-08 15:04:08 Re: Relation extension scalability
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2016-03-08 14:43:37 Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump