Re: psql completion for ids in multibyte string

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql completion for ids in multibyte string
Date: 2016-03-07 04:24:42
Message-ID: 20160307.132442.104297147.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:30:17 -0500, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CA+TgmoafGr2J90RgiF_iS8Kj_7bb5xaXnPwYcT2578cYDDUjjw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> >>> I committed this and back-patched this but (1) I avoided changing the
> >>> other functions for now and (2) I gave both the byte length and the
> >>> character length new names to avoid confusion.
> >>
> >> These tweaks appear to have been universally disliked by buildfarm
> >> members.
> >
> > Crap. Wasn't careful enough, sorry. Will fix shortly.
>
> Fix pushed.

Thank you for committing this. I can see only one commit for this
in the repository but I believe it is the fixed one.

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-03-07 04:35:41 Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-03-07 04:02:58 Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.