| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding |
| Date: | 2016-03-01 19:02:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20160301190244.GA14516@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 07:56:58PM +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Note that I am not saying that other discussed approaches are any
> better, I am saying that we should know approximately what we
> actually want and not just beat FDWs with a hammer and hope sharding
> will eventually emerge and call that the plan.
I will say it again --- FDWs are the only sharding method I can think of
that has a chance of being accepted into Postgres core. It is a plan,
and if it fails, it fails. If is succeeds, that's good. What more do
you want me to say? I know of no other way to answer the questions you
asked above.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2016-03-01 19:05:11 | Re: [REVIEW]: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-01 19:00:36 | Re: Reduce lock levels others reloptions in ALTER TABLE |