Re: Random note of encouragement

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Random note of encouragement
Date: 2016-02-25 00:43:57
Message-ID: 20160225004357.GB14651@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:50:06PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:06:34AM +1100, James Sewell wrote:
> >> Now when I run the following SQL (multiple times to allow for getting
> >> everything into shared buffers, which is 4GB on my machine):
> >>
> >>
> >> select sum(count_n) from base group by view_time_day;
> >>
> >>
> >> I get the following results:
> >>
> >>
> >> PSQL 9.5 - ~21 seconds
> >> PSQL 9.6 devel - ~8.5 seconds
> >>
> >>
> >> I think that's pretty good!
> >>
> >> I know this is a devel release, things may change, blah blah. But still,
> >> something has changed for the better here!
> >
> > Wow, that is cool. Can anyone suggest which commit improved this?
>
> Since it sums numerics, maybe integer transition functions from commit
> 959277a4f579da5243968c750069570a58e92b38 helped?

Seems it was a wrong report, but anyway, this commit was in 9.5, while
the user reported a speedup in 9.6.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2016-02-25 00:57:35 Re: Random note of encouragement
Previous Message James Sewell 2016-02-25 00:18:59 Re: Random note of encouragement