Re: Typo in bufmgr.c that result in waste of memory

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Takashi Horikawa <t-horikawa(at)aj(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Typo in bufmgr.c that result in waste of memory
Date: 2016-02-22 16:07:44
Message-ID: 20160222160744.GA5741@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 01:55:55PM +0530, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > On February 19, 2016 2:42:08 PM GMT+01:00, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >>> I think we should fix it, but not backpatch.
> >>
> >>I don't think that's particularly good policy. It's a clear bug, why
> >>would we not fix it? Leaving it as-is in the back branches can have
> >>no good effect, and what it does do is create a merge hazard for other
> >>back-patchable bug fixes in the same area.
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> +1. I think this is clearly a back-patchable fix.

Fix applied to head and 9.5.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-02-22 16:11:41 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-02-22 16:05:20 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18