Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension
Date: 2016-02-19 16:20:31
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-02-19 10:14:47 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We have already hesitated to record DDL changes for
> logical replication because of the code size, maintenance overhead, and
> testing required.

I'm not sure what you're referring to here? It'd be some relatively
minor code surgery to also pass catalog changes to output plugins. It's
just questionable what'd that bring to the table.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-02-19 16:35:48 Re: about google summer of code 2016
Previous Message David Steele 2016-02-19 16:20:13 Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension