From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Introduce group locking to prevent parallel processes from deadl |
Date: | 2016-02-17 08:32:55 |
Message-ID: | 20160217083255.GJ25464@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-02-16 23:33:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yes, exactly. I'm not certain if there are any real platforms where
> a pointer-sized write wouldn't be atomic (it sure sounds inefficient
> for that to be true), but we have not assumed that to date and I'd
> just as soon not start here.
FWIW, there's no sizeof(void*) == 8 platform supported by PG where
aligned 8 byte writes aren't atomic. There are a number of supported
platforms with sizeof(void*) == 4 without atomic 8 byte writes though.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-17 10:12:46 | pgsql: Reuse abbreviated keys in ordered [set] aggregates. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-17 08:26:29 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Introduce group locking to prevent parallel processes from deadl |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-02-17 08:34:07 | Re: Identifying a message in emit_log_hook. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-17 08:29:09 | Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension |