Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V16

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V16
Date: 2016-02-08 20:04:41
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-02-08 19:52:30 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> I think I would appreciate comments to understand why/how the ringbuffer is
> used, and more comments in general, so it is fine if you improve this part.

I'd suggest to leave out the ringbuffer/new bgwriter parts. I think
they'd be committed separately, and probably not in 9.6.



In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-02-08 20:06:11 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-02-08 20:02:36 Re: WIP: bloom filter in Hash Joins with batches