Re: backpatch for REL9_4_STABLE of commit 40482e606733675eb9e5b2f7221186cf81352da1

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hiroshi Yanagisawa <hir-yanagisawa(at)ut(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Subject: Re: backpatch for REL9_4_STABLE of commit 40482e606733675eb9e5b2f7221186cf81352da1
Date: 2016-02-08 10:22:23
Message-ID: 20160208102223.tfnreafi26eyoi5t@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-02-08 20:59:25 +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Huong Dangminh
> <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think this fixed is also required for REL9_4_STABLE.
> > Please confirm the attached patch.
>
> Yes, this fix was missed for 9.4 stable branch during back patch
> and it is available on all other supported branches.

Since this evidently was an omission, I backpatched the relevant commit
to 9.4. That seems prudent, given that the issue is documented to be
fixed there...

Thanks for the report.

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2016-02-08 10:39:37 Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-02-08 09:59:25 Re: backpatch for REL9_4_STABLE of commit 40482e606733675eb9e5b2f7221186cf81352da1