Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, stark(at)mit(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Date: 2016-02-02 13:05:31
Message-ID: 20160202130531.GA121117@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This patch has gotten its fair share of feedback in this fest. I moved
it to the next commitfest. Please do keep working on it and reviewers
that have additional comments are welcome.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2016-02-02 13:14:45 Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-02-02 13:02:48 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.