Re: pgbench - allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
Cc: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgbench - allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts
Date: 2016-02-02 09:23:59
Message-ID: 20160202.182359.54322735.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, thank you, Febien, Micael.

# Though I have made almost no activity in the last month...

At Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:53:33 +0100 (CET), Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote in <alpine(dot)DEB(dot)2(dot)10(dot)1601261352210(dot)6482(at)sto>
>
> Hello Kyotaro-san,
>
> > Thank you very much Michael but the CF app doesn't allow me to
> > regsiter new one. Filling the Description field with "pgbench -
> > allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts" and chose a
> > topic then "Find thread" shows nothing. Filling the search text
> > field on the "Attach thread" dialogue with the description or
> > giving the exact message-id gave me nothing to choose.
>
> Strange.
>
> You could try taking the old entry and selecting state "move to next
> CF"?

Hmm. The state of the old entry in CF2015-11 is already "Move*d*
to next CF" and it is not found in CF2016-01, as far as I saw.

At Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:21:49 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqRtaz2nGb-7wQJ+w1-rFyFFxkruesNBM3RcPCgXaCoSmQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > Filling the Description field with "pgbench -
> > allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts" and chose a
> > topic then "Find thread" shows nothing. Filling the search text
> > field on the "Attach thread" dialogue with the description or
> > giving the exact message-id gave me nothing to choose.
>
> Really? That's because the patch is marked as returned with feedback here:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/319/

Ah, I have many candidates in "Attach thread" dialog. That would
be a temporary symptom of a kind of the CF-seaon-wise
meaintenance.

> > Maybe should I repost the patch so that the "Attach thread" can
> > find it as a "recent" email?
>
> What if you just add it to next CF with a new entry? You are actually
> proposing an entirely new patch.

So, I finally could register an entry for CF2016-3.
Thank you all for the suggestion.

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2016-02-02 09:28:52 Re: PostgreSQL Auditing
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2016-02-02 08:27:12 Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6