Re: Template for commit messages

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Template for commit messages
Date: 2016-01-29 09:42:08
Message-ID: 20160129094208.GD2851@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 07:30:58PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I have no prejudice in this area, other than one in favor of any
> rules being fairly precise. As for nuances, I guess they can be
> specified in the commit message. The one thing I do find annoying
> from time to time is the limit on subject size. Sometimes it's very
> difficult to be sufficiently communicative in, say, 50 characters.

Agreed, but that is a gitweb limit we can't control, I think.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-01-29 09:53:21 Re: Template for commit messages
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-01-29 09:41:15 Re: Template for commit messages